Explore Features  Free Trial

SendLabs Blog

Email Marketing best practices, thoughts and more


Categories



Become an Email Marketing Pro


Subscribe
Hints tips, best practices, recent blog posts and happenings dropped into your inbox.

Subscribe to the semi-regular email newsletter from the crew at SendLabs.

Note: We don't rent, sell or spam your email. Get an issue or two. If it isn't satisfying, unsubscribe at anytime.
Friday, January 11, 2008
Email Marketing: You're kidding me, right?

My head was pounding as I first woke up today. Then, I checked my inbox and the pain increased ten-fold. No witty banter...let's just jump right into it!

Victim One: Edmonton Rush

This Canadian team has an awesome website and compete in a very vibrant, fun industry: professional indoor lacrosse. If you haven't seen a game featuring teams from the National Lacrosse League, think of it as hockey without the ice. Hits, goals, fights and more player accessibility than in the NHL are a reason why crowds are flocking to these games.

So why are the Rush's email templates so bad? Between the bland gray background/black letter combo and the questionable above-the-fold layout, I especially like the subject line spelling error ("Predications" instead of Predictions), which is then repeated in the body of the email. Yikes.



Victim Two: MediaPost

I really, really expected more from these guys, but wow, this one is bad.

 

For beginners, if your template is brown, STOP. There's nothing good that can come out of a brown template...ever.

Next, there's a philosophy we have of letting text 'breathe' a bit with spacing at the edges. Most designers take this into account, but not MediaPost's. Right up to the edges, baby!

Speaking of this text, could there be a more boring font to use? What, Times New Roman wasn't available?

If you're a "Premier Sponsor," are you excited about seeing your logos in an isolated white box that seems like an afterthought? How about centering the box or just building...never mind.

Amidst all of the punctuation mistakes, two additional items stand out: one being the </td> tag below the sponsor logos and the www.mediapst.com unsubscribe lnk. Isn't it MediaPost?

When you do rush jobs, it always looks like you did a rush job.

Victim 3: Domino's

They did it again! Remember what I talked about the other day with Domino's and their 100% graphic email mess, complete with a subject line featuring HTML code? Guess what? On Wednesday, they did the SAME EXACT CAMPAIGN, complete with the HTML code! They can't be this asleep at the wheel, can they?

If you'll excuse me, I need to mix myself an Advil/Tylenol cocktail.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Posted on Friday, January 11, 2008 at 4:07 PM in Industry News and Thoughts | Best Practices

Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (0)

Add comment


 

  Country flag





Live preview

September 8, 2008 12:50 PM




Related posts

Email Marketing: Is Pizza Hut Delivering Great Email?
In 2006 alone, Pizza Hut brought in over $9.3 billion in sales, almost doubling the second-place finisher, Domino's. You see their TV ads and you see their flyers in your mailbox every few months. They spend a lot of money in branding themselves a certain way and take great care in their image. So why isn't their email given the proper care?

Email Marketing: 16 reasons not to paste and blast emails from Outlook
This one seems to come up often with smaller businesses or email marketing newbies. I thought I'd give you some food for thought as to why pasting code into Microsoft Outlook and blasting is not such a good idea for your company, its brand or your sanity. I vow to post three new reasons a day until I run out. (Hint: maybe there are a lot of them).

Email Marketing: The Anatomy of a Junk Email
Like most of us in the web world, I'm a bit groggy first thing in the morning anyway. As a result, I do a lot of clicking and deleting when I first check my email in the A.M. A lil' junk mail did make it through to my inbox (high five, spammers!) and this one in particular made me laugh; not LOL style, but more of a smirk.